
When did Ben Elton go from funny social commentator with a penchant for satiric wit to a bitter, bitter old man? Even if you've been in denial for a while, Blind Faith is terribly disappointing.
It's become a post-apocalyptic world - "not with a bang, but a whimper". Global warming and a variety of wars and laws have turned London into dirty, hot, disease ridden pit - and that's the good bit. "feeling" and revealing everything about yourself is the law; having privacy isn't. Trafford and his wife, Chantorria, have a new baby... which has a fifty percent chance of dying young.
Trafford doesn't like to share. He doesn't like exposed skin. He doesn't want to know about the sex life of his neighbours. He hungers for more than feelings - he hungers for knowledge, proof, an internal life. So when he is approached by a work colleague with an illegal proposition, he is intrigued.
Trafford discovers a hidden world underneath the world where everything is revealed. Not only does his life become enriched, but he finds a woman - who is even more secretive than himself. As his knowledge grows, so does his belief that the world, as it has become, is terribly wrong.
Trafford comes up with a plan - a revolutionary plan. He wants to reintroduce evolution, science, and literature to the world, and he thinks he knows just how to do it. But with his secret in danger, his wife becoming more and more unstable, and the very real possibility of betrayal lurking around every corner, it's a race against time...
Ben Elton used to be funny. This man wrote The Young Ones! And Blackadder! Even when he was writing his trademark, issue based, satirical fiction, he still managed to be funny. That, I think, was the beauty of Ben Elton. He managed to take an issue, like environmentalism, and bring it into the reader's consciousness in a funny, eye-opening way. It's what made him so good at issue-based novels. He grabbed the attention and held on, using humour and good characters, and then the reader got engaged with the issues withing the story as well.
Blind Faith doesn't fall into that category.
Basically, Blind Faith raises issues to do with religion, science, T.V., technology, the internet, music videos, sharing (in the Oprah sense of the word), dressing children in g-strings and then complaining about pedophiles, and so forth. The futuristic world he creates contains all of these elements, taken to an extreme. My first problem with this creation is that it was clumsily done. It was a bit over the top, a bit high-school, a bit "the reader is so stupid, I really have to make this shit obvious". For a veteran with eleven novels under his belt, this is unforgivable. And this brings me to my next point: Ben Elton seems to have lost all faith in humanity. It's depressing, and it's as though he thinks people are so stupid, and society is in such a desperate state, that this is where we're all going to end up. And frankly, I don't like to read about how stupid I am, and how shit the world is, and have it be so over the top and depressing that it isn't even funny. I DON'T think people are, as a whole, that stupid. I mean, sure, there are a lot of stupid ones out there, don't get me wrong. But really. Not THAT many.
This was one of the most disappointing books I've read in some time. Probably because, even though he has been getting rant-ier, I expect better. Sorry Ben Elton.
Die hard Ben Elton fans, I guess. And of course, people who are just as cranky and jaded as he is with plight of western civilisation.
Try something else! You could look into Elton's earlier works, they're much better. You could read Carl Hiassen, who combines entertainment with serious environmental issues. Or, if you want a light-hearted romp, you could read Tuxes, by Scott Fivelson. It's not so much with the serious issues, but it is satirical AND funny and you don't feel depressed at the end.
Which is important.
| Title: | Blind Faith |
| Author: | Ben Elton |
| Publisher: | Bantam |
| ISBN: | 0593058003 |
| Year published: | 2007 |
| Pages: | 320 |
| Genre(s): | Fiction, Satire |
Comments
I enjoyed the book and would
I enjoyed the book and would rate it more highly, BUT I felt that it borrowed from Nineteen Eighty-Four and Brave New World so much that it borders on plagiarism. Ben Elton is capable of more originality than this.
Blind Faith - How to renew the thesis of 1984
I started Blind Faith, wondering how it would differ from 1984.
It does not attempt to restate Orwell's thesis that the absence of a word means that the mental concept attached to that word cannot exist. Orwell's example (in Newspeak) "All mans is free" is nonsensical, for it allows freedom only in the sense that "All mans has two legs".
What Elton does is to create a more visceral, more personal world. Elton is a dramatist, not a moral philosopher. His world, though does look forward from the excesses of today, just as Orwells looked forward from the brutality and repression of the 1940s.
Trafford is a different hero from Winston Smith. Smith principally suffered betrayal at the hands of O'Brien, his alienation as a sane man in a mad world, and the torment of lost beauty. Trafford is continually beset. Every interaction with others is a direct, violent assault on his fragile integrity. He is directly challenged for his sin of privacy in a way that Smith was not.
Trafford has more of a sense of purposiveness than Smith, albeit fostered by two people, Cassius and Sandra Dee. And there is a sense - not only due to Trafford living in a world closer to ours - of Trafford being more of a *person* than (to overstate Orwell's Smith) a vehicle for moral debate.
Blind faith is a hopeful book. In his apotheosis, Trafford knows that the e-mail seed he has sown *will* take root and blossom. Winston had no such hope - "The fight was over, he loved Big Brother"
Me, I give Blind Faith many stars. It can be accused of deriving from 1984. My feeling is that is accepts 1984's thesis, casts itself much more viscerally, and ends with a certainty - more powerful than belief in The Lord and The Love, that liberty will again shine forth.
Ian Batty
Blind faith
This book gave me the horrors - Elton has taken the seeds of what already exists and grown them to an extreme but perfectly possible conclusion.
I was reminded of Brave New World and 1984, but all good stories get rewritten in the spirit of their times, and provide fresh insights and warnings. The humour was just very black.....but a book that needed to be written I think. I see elements and hints of the Blind Faith world all around.
Good - though somewhat eerie
It took me a little bit of time to get into this book, but eventually I really enjoyed it. Yes, it is kind of black and depressing - and probably somewhat over the top. But I find myself looking at current affairs, reality shows and some of the other issues addressed in the book now and feel a certain sense of foreboding. I think it is somewhat unfair to expect every book by Ben Elton to be funny above all else. He obviously feels strongly about these issues and was trying to raise them in a thought provoking way. Perhaps it is necessary to strongly caricature aspects of our society which we slowly grow into and therefore tend to eventually accept as part of our lives, in order to see the sense - or in this case non-sense - behind them.
By the way; does it only strike me as somewhat ironic that we are blogging our opinions about this book??